P2: Early Potential Identification – Who Can Learn to Lead?

Situation

There is no consistent method to spot early leadership potential in Juniors/Young Professionals. Selection is driven by current performance, not teachability. Development pathways are ad-hoc.

Symptoms

Identification & Development Gaps

• No common criteria for learnability and growth capacity
• Performance metrics overshadow potential indicators
• Limited view of cognitive flexibility and ambiguity handling
• Motivation to develop others not distinguished from career ambition
• EI/feedback openness not captured for early talent

Strategic Effects

• Shallow bench despite available talent
• Misallocated development spend and stalled trajectories
• Avoidable early promotion failures or delayed readiness
• Pipeline timelines unpredictable; succession plans slip

Challenge

Primary Goal: Identify individuals with teachability over time and build structured development runways (6–18 months) before leadership performance is visible.

Why it matters: Potential-based identification improves long-term placement success and creates a predictable, diverse pipeline without over-promoting on performance alone.

Key Questions to Answer

• Who shows the cognitive and emotional capacity to learn leadership?
• Who demonstrates learning agility, adaptability, and resilience?
• Who is motivated to develop others, not only advance personally?
• What EI indicators predict coachability and growth?
• What trajectory and timeline fit each individual?

Solution Approach

Deploy a future-focused diagnostic that separates current performance from growth capacity.

Phase 1: Fundamental Capability Scan

• Learning agility and adaptability profiling
• Cognitive flexibility for complexity and ambiguity
• EI baseline (self-awareness, empathy, influence) and feedback receptivity

Phase 2: Motivation & Trajectory Design

• Leadership motivation authenticity (people/impact vs. status)
• Growth mindset and coaching readiness
• Individual development paths with milestones and time horizons

Expected Outcomes

• Immediate (0–3 months): Named early-potential list with development priorities
• Medium term (3–9 months): Cohort programs with measurable skill gains and checkpoints
• Long term (9+ months): Stronger internal pipeline, higher placement success, fewer premature promotions

Compare the 9 closest-fit tools for this case

PEATS Guides give you comparable facts on what each tool actually measures and a decision-ready summary for stakeholders. You get true clarity on scope and limits, a side-by-side comparison of strengths, weaknesses, and scientific quality, plus a concise executive brief for HR/IT/board with setup notes, risks, and do’s/don’ts.